Murtaza Jaffer

In my corner of the bush, the term ‘rule of law’ is acquiring popular coinage. Like its predecessors, “human rights and democracy”, “corruption and good governance” and “transparency and accountability”, “rule of law” is now the new fashion phrase taken from a foreign language. I haven’t heard the term translated and used in more than a couple of the 140 odd local languages in daily use in the region.  Perhaps its mystique, power and appeal are locked in its un-translated foreignness. If we broke the pod its innards would spill out, spread away and the whole would lose meaning.

So we stay with the whole phrase – rule of law – with each one appreciating it according to her needs or as the occasion demands.

For the politicians threatened by new constitutional dispensations it is fair game to undermine the spirit of the new constitution by playing with its letters, rearranging them to give innovative meaning to constitutional provisions that will assist them survive the forthcoming elections without the necessary educational qualifications required of a new ‘Honourable Member of Parliament’. To the public it is a fundamental breach of the law – hence against the rule of law.

Parliament also wants to change the rules in the vetting of judges by an independent committee for suitability in office – a revolutionary proposal that has shaken many a judge’s hitherto untouchable thrones. Civil society groups have loudly voiced their opposition to these attempts at undermining the rule of law.

The Muslims in Tanzania, as has happened in Kenya, want to have the Kadhi’s Court enshrined in the new constitution currently under discussion. The Christians, secularists and others object. A constitution has no place for religious laws, some argue. Greco-Roman, Christian and African customs and Islamic Sharia are all sources of law in the country, others retort. Where do laws come from so that the rule of law can rule? Tight quandaries with foreign words, all these.

What then is the rule of law? Is it that the law rules? Who makes the laws? What if they are unjust? What if one law is against the other? Must we suffer laws until someone has the inclination and resources to go to court and have it interpreted? What if the courts are inefficient or do not work well?

Can we depend on the rule of law, especially in transitional situations, where all terms are open and discussions incomplete on the type of state the people can/will have? Can the rule of law hold forth before the larger philosophical underpinnings of governance and the nature of the state are settled? Can these be resolved outside the ever-changing global situation that often has more impact on governance change than local inputs?

In my neck of the woods we are living through pretty exciting times, throwing up all manner of so-called ‘foreign ideas’, attempting translations and publicly interrogating them, extracting their juices and often realizing that they taste the same as the other fruits with other names that exist in our own cultures, languages and societies. We are recognizing that despite our foreignness to the owners of the foreign words, we are actually all human all the time.  And so aluta continua as we discover new meanings and domesticate foreign terms and realize our common humanity.

The challenge however seems not to be with the rule of law but the lawful rulers of yesterday, oppressive and powerful, who want to continue to remain in office beyond their expiry dates.  

Can yesterday’s failures be tomorrow’s saviours?

How can the rule of law address this challenge?

Disclaimer: I write in my personal capacity and not as employee of the United Nations. The views expressed are entirely my own and should not be attributed to my employer.

Murtaza Jaffer

Murtaza Jaffer is a lawyer and human rights activist. He previously served as a Judge in Kenya and on the boards of several government, private sector and non-governmental bodies as well as inter-faith groups. Mr. Jaffer worked on human rights, judicial and organizational capacity building issues in a number of transitional and conflict countries in Africa, including Somalia and South Sudan.

title bar

Read More

title bar
The Warsaw Principles for the Rule of Law

WARSAW, Poland – 26 June 26, 2025 – A global coalition of organizational leaders and justice advocates issued an urgent call to action today to reverse the worldwide decline in the rule of law, marked by the release of the Warsaw Principles at the conclusion of the 2025 World Justice Forum. The Warsaw Principles represent a unified front against rising authoritarian pressures and a framework for collective action to strengthen accountability.

Read More
Chief Justice Zondo accepts the World Justice Project Rule of Law Award

WARSAW, Poland – June 12, 2025 – Former South African Chief Justice Raymond Zondo was awarded the prestigious World Justice Project (WJP) Rule of Law Award in recognition of his unwavering commitment to justice and his courageous efforts in exposing systemic corruption. The award was presented by WJP Board Vice President Judy Perry Martinez at the 2025 World Justice Forum, a global gathering of rule of law champions. Polish Minister of Justice Adam Bodnar, a prior recipient of the award in 2019, made accompanying remarks.

Read More
Adam Bodnar remarks at the World Justice Forum 2025 Opening Reception

WARSAW, Poland – 23 June, 2025 – Hundreds of global leaders, jurists, and human rights champions gathered in Warsaw—a city with a profound history in the struggle for freedom—for the opening of the 2025 World Justice Forum. The summit aims to mobilize collective action against a rising tide of authoritarianism and reverse the global rule of law recession.

Read More