Cherie Blair CBE
Omnia Strategy LLP

This year’s Davos rightly created some noise around the idea that businesses have an important role to play in protecting fundamental rights. A particular highlight was the publication of the B Team Leader’s statement (“B Team Leaders call for business to stand up for human rights”) supported by Richard Branson, Arianna Huffington, Mo Ibrahim and Professor Muhammed Yunus among others. It called for business leaders to use their influence to uphold human rights, including decent working conditions, fair wages and ethical purchasing decisions. This is not the first time that business and human rights has been on the Davos agenda; in 1999, Kofi Annan’s ground-breaking Global Compact initiative was announced there.                                  

Mrs. Cherie Blair QC, World Justice Project Honorary Chair, speaking at the 2012 WJP Rule of Law Index Launch - Ana Victoria Cruz / The World Justice Project
Mrs. Cherie Blair QC, World Justice Project Honorary Chair, speaking at the 2012 WJP Rule of Law Index Launch - Ana Victoria Cruz / The World Justice Project

           

Since 1999, evidence that embracing human rights is good for business has grown dramatically. According to a recent study undertaken by the Harvard Business School, companies that have adopted a comprehensive set of corporate policies related to the environment, employees, community, products, and customers, “significantly outperform their counterparts over the long-term, both in terms of stock market as well as accounting performance”.  In an increasingly connected world, companies need to preserve one of their greatest assets, brand equity. Studies have shown that customer boycotts of products tainted by human rights abuses cost demonised companies around GBP 2.6 billion a year. This is one of the reasons why far sighted businesses are paying attention to human rights and reaping the benefits in terms of competitive advantage, increased productivity, whilst reducing cost and attracting smart investors. All of this has an additional benefit in attracting the best recruits. Studies have shown that companies with human rights compliant work practices receive up to 45 percent more unsolicited employment applications than companies that do not.

Nevertheless when I discuss these issues with CEOs and business leaders, the same question arises: what are the practical steps that can be taken to promote human rights without crippling operations?  Taking a human rights approach to business is not just another rebranding of corporate social responsibility initiatives or philanthropy. Philanthropic giving is, of course, to be encouraged by any socially responsible company, but building a medical clinic, or supporting a local NGO, cannot offset complicity in child labour practices, or discriminatory treatment of workers. Integrating human rights goes to the core of a business; it requires implementation of policy commitments, efficient management structures, and ongoing due diligence procedures.

The Human Rights Council’s 2011 endorsement of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (better known as the “Guiding Principles”) provided some much needed clarity on this issue. The Principles deliver some practical advice, encouraging businesses to publish human rights policies for instance. But policies alone are meaningless if they are not integrated into the day to day practices of a business. Good intentions at head office level are not enough if they do not permeate the furthest reaches of the company. Much has been learnt about stakeholder engagement since Royal Dutch Shell’s conflict in the Niger Delta with the Ogoni people. The impact of that dispute was a 16 year legal battle to reach a settlement of US$15.5 million. However, the extractives industry by its nature faces the risk of conflict with local communities impacted by its operations.  An interesting SRMining paper published in 2011 has estimated that company-community conflicts can cost the average world-class mining project[i] a staggering US$20 million per week in lost productivity through delays. This makes a compelling case for investing into engaging with affected communities, with accessible grievance mechanisms and fair and swift remediation if abuses are identified.

Managing supply chain risk also involves significant challenges and investment, particularly for the commercial consumer goods industry. Nevertheless it is essential companies take this risk to heart. The garment industry learnt its lesson after the terrible collapse of the Rana Plaza factory building in April 2013, which killed more than 1,100 people and injured a further 2,500.  I am pleased to see that the recently announced Accord on Fire and Building Safety in Bangladesh is gaining good traction with over 130 signatories. This is a legally-binding agreement that requires independent safety inspections with public reports on all Bangladeshi suppliers used by the signatory companies, and mandatory repairs, renovations and safety upgrades. The tragedy is that this step only came about after such dreadful loss of life. More consistent, effective, human rights due diligence such as this performed by the brands we know and love could prevent a great amount of human suffering.

I recognise that improving, resolving and overcoming human rights injustice requires both financial and leadership commitment from big and small business alike and the balance is not always easy. Nevertheless we must keep pushing for transparency and accountability, for better standards and the living wage.  As transparency and technology inform the choices we make and the products we buy, companies that can demonstrate their commitment to improving the living standards and environment in the countries they work will be rewarded in their bottom line, and that is the business case for human rights that caused so much interest in Davos last month.

 

[i] Classified as mining projects with a capital expenditure of between US$3–5 billion.

Cherie Blair CBE Omnia Strategy LLP

Wife of former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, leading lawyer and committed campaigner for women’s rights, Cherie founded the Cherie Blair Foundation for Women in 2008 to help women build small and growing businesses in Africa, South Asia and the Middle East. 

Cherie studied law at the London School of Economics and was called to the Bar in 1976. She became a Queen’s Counsel in 1995 and in 2000 co-founded Matrix Chambers. Cherie is also the Co-Founder and Chair of Omnia Strategy LLP, a law firm based in London that provides strategic counsel to governments, corporates and private clients. She has over 35 years as a leading barrister specialising in public law, human rights, European Community law and arbitration.  Cherie currently also sits as a part-time judge and is an accredited mediator. 

In 2007, she was awarded the Eleanor Roosevelt Val-Kill medal in recognition of her high ideals and courageous actions and in 2012 received the Trinity Justitia Omnibus Award for her commitment to Human Rights. Cherie became a Commander of the British Empire (“CBE”) in the 2013 New Year's Honours List for services to Women's Issues and to charity in the UK and Overseas.

In addition to founding her own charity, she is a member of the International Center for Research on Women’s leadership council, ambassador for the GSMA Women Programme, honorary vice president of Barnados, president of the Loomba Foundation, ambassador for Scope, trustee of Africa Justice Foundation and patron of a number of charities. She is also Chancellor of the Asian University for Women which seeks to educate girls from within the region to become leaders. Cherie is also Vice-Chair of the US Secretary of State’s International Council for Women’s Business Leadership and Honorary Chair of the World Justice Project. 

title bar

Read More

title bar
The Twin Crises of Public Health and the Rule of Law

The World Justice Project is focusing knowledge- and awareness-building activities across four issue areas where the public health crisis and rule of law intersect most urgently: corruption, accountable governance, fundamental rights, and access to justice for all. This series of policy briefs highlights emerging concerns in each of these areas.

Read More
The COVID-19 Pandemic and the Global Justice Gap

This policy brief on COVID-19 and its effects on the global justice gap is part of a multidisciplinary initiative from the World Justice Project to expand knowledge of the relationship between public health and the rule of law, and to identify measures to tackle the twin crises of the COVID-19 pandemic and the rule of law.

Read More
World Justice Challenge 2021

The World Justice Challenge 2021: Advancing the Rule of Law in a Time of Crisis is a global competition to identify, recognize, and promote good practices and high-impact projects and policies that protect and advance areas of the rule of law most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Read More

Over the second half of 2020, the Pathfinders for Peaceful, Just and Inclusive Societies, World Justice Project, and the Open Society Justice Initiative will host a series of conversations to identify strategies to strengthen the collection and use of justice data in the COVID-19 era. 

Read More