Imagine being picked off the street, told you committed a murder you know nothing about, and sentenced to 20 years in prison during Kafkaesque trial proceedings with no judge or jury present.
In 2005, this happened to Toño Zúñiga, in Mexico City. Mr. Zúñiga was lucky that two young lawyers obtained a retrial, videotaped it, and made a hit documentary with their footage. When Cinépolis and Televisa put “Presumed Guilty” on cinema and television screens in Mexico, many legal professionals excitedly pointed out that a judge was present in the film’s courtroom, when--owing to the written nature of the proceedings--judges usually weren’t.
The World Justice Project (WJP) is now evaluating the changes in crime investigation, prosecution services, and trial procedures under the NCJS. As a first step in this evaluation, the WJP analyzed data from the first National Inmate Survey (ENPOL 2016) conducted by Mexico’s National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI). This survey was administered to almost 60,000 inmates, and it allows testing the NCJS performance from the user’s perspective and experience.
Prisoners were asked whether there was a judge present in the courtroom; whether the judge was paying attention to the proceedings and whether the court proceedings were audio or video recorded, among hundreds of other questions.
WJP created pre- and post-reform groups of inmates using combined data from the inmate survey with the implementation dates of the new justice system at the municipal level. The following charts compare the experiences of inmates tried before and after the reforms were put in place, showing a significant increase in the percentage of hearings that are audio or video recorded, along with judges being present and paying attention during court hearings.
In order to congratulate the supporters of the reforms, Mexico’s film industry, the moviegoers who supported Presumed Guilty, and the reformers who implemented the change, WJP decided to share the good news in the form of holiday cards, available in both English and Spanish. Download yours at the bottom of the page and share the good news!
With NCJS, judges are present during court hearings
This graph compares the experience of inmates who were processed under the old and new criminal justice system, combining information from the National Inmate Survey (ENPOL) and the implementation dates of the New Criminal Justice System (NCJS). Each dot represents the percentage of inmates who were arrested each month, and who reported the judge was present during court hearings“always” or “most of the time”. ENPOL is the first inmate survey conducted at a national level in Mexico, and was administered during the last months of 2016 to almost 60,000 people. We will soon publish a detailed analysis.
With NCJS, court proceedings are more frequently recorded
This graph compares the experience of inmates who were processed under the old and new criminal justice system, combining information from the National Inmate Survey (ENPOL) and the implementation dates of the New Criminal Justice System (NCJS). Each dot represents the percentage of inmates who were arrested each month, and who reported their court hearings were audio or video recorded. ENPOL is the first inmate survey conducted at a national level in Mexico, and was administered during the last months of 2016 to almost 60,000 people. We will soon publish a detailed analysis.
With NCJS, judges pay more attention during court hearings
This graph compares the experience of inmates who were processed under the old and new criminal justice system, combining information from the National Inmate Survey (ENPOL) and the implementation dates of the New Criminal Justice System (NCJS). Each dot represents the percentage of inmates who were arrested each month, and who reported the judge payed attention “always” or “most of the time” during their court hearings. ENPOL is the first inmate survey conducted at a national level in Mexico, and was administered during the last months of 2016 to almost 60,000 people. We will soon publish a detailed analysis.
The decline of trust in public institutions is not a phenomenon confined to any single border; it is a defining global crisis of the 21st century. From the Americas to Southeast Asia, intensifying political polarization and a growing sense of disillusionment with traditional political institutions are evident. However, to understand the mechanics of this decay, we must look to where the data is most granular.
The rule of law is a vital economic asset for the private sector. Learn how predictable legal systems drive investment, mitigate risk, and why businesses must advocate for judicial independence in an era of global backsliding.
Access free, global justice datasets from the World Justice Project. Download comparable data on access to justice, EU microdata on democratic perceptions, and open justice evaluations in Mexico.
WJP’s people-centered analysis finds injustice and poverty are closely linked, as wealth deprivation fuels cycles of severe legal problems, unmet needs, and hardship.