Imagine being picked off the street, told you committed a murder you know nothing about, and sentenced to 20 years in prison during Kafkaesque trial proceedings with no judge or jury present.
In 2005, this happened to Toño Zúñiga, in Mexico City. Mr. Zúñiga was lucky that two young lawyers obtained a retrial, videotaped it, and made a hit documentary with their footage. When Cinépolis and Televisa put “Presumed Guilty” on cinema and television screens in Mexico, many legal professionals excitedly pointed out that a judge was present in the film’s courtroom, when--owing to the written nature of the proceedings--judges usually weren’t.
The World Justice Project (WJP) is now evaluating the changes in crime investigation, prosecution services, and trial procedures under the NCJS. As a first step in this evaluation, the WJP analyzed data from the first National Inmate Survey (ENPOL 2016) conducted by Mexico’s National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI). This survey was administered to almost 60,000 inmates, and it allows testing the NCJS performance from the user’s perspective and experience.
Prisoners were asked whether there was a judge present in the courtroom; whether the judge was paying attention to the proceedings and whether the court proceedings were audio or video recorded, among hundreds of other questions.
WJP created pre- and post-reform groups of inmates using combined data from the inmate survey with the implementation dates of the new justice system at the municipal level. The following charts compare the experiences of inmates tried before and after the reforms were put in place, showing a significant increase in the percentage of hearings that are audio or video recorded, along with judges being present and paying attention during court hearings.
In order to congratulate the supporters of the reforms, Mexico’s film industry, the moviegoers who supported Presumed Guilty, and the reformers who implemented the change, WJP decided to share the good news in the form of holiday cards, available in both English and Spanish. Download yours at the bottom of the page and share the good news!
With NCJS, judges are present during court hearings
This graph compares the experience of inmates who were processed under the old and new criminal justice system, combining information from the National Inmate Survey (ENPOL) and the implementation dates of the New Criminal Justice System (NCJS). Each dot represents the percentage of inmates who were arrested each month, and who reported the judge was present during court hearings“always” or “most of the time”. ENPOL is the first inmate survey conducted at a national level in Mexico, and was administered during the last months of 2016 to almost 60,000 people. We will soon publish a detailed analysis.
With NCJS, court proceedings are more frequently recorded
This graph compares the experience of inmates who were processed under the old and new criminal justice system, combining information from the National Inmate Survey (ENPOL) and the implementation dates of the New Criminal Justice System (NCJS). Each dot represents the percentage of inmates who were arrested each month, and who reported their court hearings were audio or video recorded. ENPOL is the first inmate survey conducted at a national level in Mexico, and was administered during the last months of 2016 to almost 60,000 people. We will soon publish a detailed analysis.
With NCJS, judges pay more attention during court hearings
This graph compares the experience of inmates who were processed under the old and new criminal justice system, combining information from the National Inmate Survey (ENPOL) and the implementation dates of the New Criminal Justice System (NCJS). Each dot represents the percentage of inmates who were arrested each month, and who reported the judge payed attention “always” or “most of the time” during their court hearings. ENPOL is the first inmate survey conducted at a national level in Mexico, and was administered during the last months of 2016 to almost 60,000 people. We will soon publish a detailed analysis.
On July 2, 2025, the World Justice Project (WJP) was honored to participate in the United Kingdom House of Lords Constitution Committee’s official inquiry into the rule of law. This invitation followed WJP’s written submission and marked an invaluable opportunity to support evidence-based policymaking in the United Kingdom.
It is with incredibly heavy hearts that we share the news of the passing of our founder and dear friend, William H. Neukom, known to all of us simply as Bill.
Bill was the driving force behind the World Justice Project (WJP), and his absence leaves a profound void in the soul of our organization. His belief in justice was unwavering. His deep humanity and his remarkable gift for bringing people together—regardless of background or origin—shaped everything we do at WJP.
WARSAW, Poland – 26 June 26, 2025 – A global coalition of organizational leaders and justice advocates issued an urgent call to action today to reverse the worldwide decline in the rule of law, marked by the release of the Warsaw Principles at the conclusion of the 2025 World Justice Forum. The Warsaw Principles represent a unified front against rising authoritarian pressures and a framework for collective action to strengthen accountability.
WARSAW, Poland – June 12, 2025 – Former South African Chief Justice Raymond Zondo was awarded the prestigious World Justice Project (WJP) Rule of Law Award in recognition of his unwavering commitment to justice and his courageous efforts in exposing systemic corruption. The award was presented by WJP Board Vice President Judy Perry Martinez at the 2025 World Justice Forum, a global gathering of rule of law champions. Polish Minister of Justice Adam Bodnar, a prior recipient of the award in 2019, made accompanying remarks.