Federico Andreu-Guzmán
International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ)

The crime of forced internal displacement is not a new phenomenon in Colombia. It has been a widespread practice in the country’s internal armed conflict for several decades. However, forced internal displacement cannot be reduced to an inherent or unintended effect of the conflict. The armed actors in the Colombian armed conflict—the army and its paramilitary groups, on one hand, and the guerrilla groups, on the other—have used the practice of forced displacement of civilian populations as part of their military strategies to take control of or maintain a presence in certain territories. The practice involves expelling people considered to be an actual or potential part of the social base of the enemy, in order to ensure control of territories and populations. Several of the Colombian army’s manuals on counterinsurgency operations classify the “internal enemy” or “subversive forces” as “armed groups” and “insurgent civilian populations.”

  1. These manuals order the creation of paramilitary groups to combat the “internal enemy,”
  2. as well as threatening the “insurgent civilian population” with expulsion from their regions.
  3. Along these lines, the army has used displacement as a tactic of war within a military strategy of “draining the water to catch the fish”: removing populations from regions it considers to be the social base of the guerrilla groups.

The displacement of civilians has also been part of the paramilitary strategy of dispossession and usurpation of land. And the military operations of the different guerrilla groups have generated internal displacement as well; in certain cases, there are clear indications that some of these groups have used displacement as a tactic of war within a strategy of controlling regions with military or economic value.

Armed actors with military objectives are not the only ones who employ tactics of forced displacement in Colombia’s conflict. Indeed, dispossession of land has been a strategic objective of many actors for a variety of reasons, including economic and political motives. Much of the violence that has affected millions of peasants across the country over the past three decades has been committed in the interest of seizing land for economic, military, and political purposes. The accumulation of land by paramilitaries as well as legal and economic actors—by licit actors, such as domestic and international agribusiness and mining companies, and illicit actors, such as drug traffickers—underlies the Colombian conflict. The accumulation of land is intimately related to the phenomenon of forced displacement. In several cases, actors of the “legal” economy and the illegal economy have provided support to paramilitary groups in their efforts to seize land. This has been denounced by the UN special representative of the secretary-general on the human rights of internally displaced persons in the following terms:

There is a widespread perception among displaced persons that there is no willingness to return land and other property to them and, in some regions of the country, they suspect that while displacement may originally have been caused by armed conflict, the taking over of their lands by large corporations is at least a side effect, if not part of a policy of forced displacement. The Representative heard allegations of lands occupied illegally, either through transfer of titles under duress and for minimal financial compensation or through forgery of land titles. Also, there were numerous allegations that indigenous land and Afro-Colombian collective property were acquired in violation of article 60 of the Colombian Constitution and of Law No. 70.4.

There is a clear connection, then, between internal displacement and the dispossession of land, which paramilitary groups have perpetrated in order to facilitate the accumulation of land by economic actors. As was revealed in criminal investigations in several cases, the pattern of displacement and dispossession is not a mere coincidence, and it explains alliances between paramilitary groups and economic actors.

Click here to read the full paper on Criminal Justice and Forced Displacement in Colombia

Federico Andreu-Guzmán International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ)

Federico Andreu-Guzmán is Deputy Director of Litigation and Legal Protection at the Colombian Commission of Jurists. His previous positions have included General Counsel of the International Commission of Jurists (2000–2009), Legal Adviser for Americas and Asian Regions Programs of the International Secretariat of Amnesty International (1997–2000), and Deputy Secretary General for Latin America of the Federation International Human Rights (FIDH). He has been, on several occasions, a consultant for the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and a member of the UN Human Rights Mission in Rwanda and the International Civilian Mission Observation of Human Rights in Haiti.

title bar

Read More

title bar
WJP Chief of Public Sector Partnerships Mark Lewis during his participation in the United Kingdom House of Lords Constitution Committee’s official inquiry into the rule of law

On July 2, 2025, the World Justice Project (WJP) was honored to participate in the United Kingdom House of Lords Constitution Committee’s official inquiry into the rule of law. This invitation followed WJP’s written submission and marked an invaluable opportunity to support evidence-based policymaking in the United Kingdom.

Read More

It is with incredibly heavy hearts that we share the news of the passing of our founder and dear friend, William H. Neukom, known to all of us simply as Bill. Bill was the driving force behind the World Justice Project (WJP), and his absence leaves a profound void in the soul of our organization. His belief in justice was unwavering. His deep humanity and his remarkable gift for bringing people together—regardless of background or origin—shaped everything we do at WJP.

Read More
The Warsaw Principles for the Rule of Law

WARSAW, Poland – 26 June 26, 2025 – A global coalition of organizational leaders and justice advocates issued an urgent call to action today to reverse the worldwide decline in the rule of law, marked by the release of the Warsaw Principles at the conclusion of the 2025 World Justice Forum. The Warsaw Principles represent a unified front against rising authoritarian pressures and a framework for collective action to strengthen accountability.

Read More
Chief Justice Zondo accepts the World Justice Project Rule of Law Award

WARSAW, Poland – June 12, 2025 – Former South African Chief Justice Raymond Zondo was awarded the prestigious World Justice Project (WJP) Rule of Law Award in recognition of his unwavering commitment to justice and his courageous efforts in exposing systemic corruption. The award was presented by WJP Board Vice President Judy Perry Martinez at the 2025 World Justice Forum, a global gathering of rule of law champions. Polish Minister of Justice Adam Bodnar, a prior recipient of the award in 2019, made accompanying remarks.

Read More