The Rule of Law
in Ecuador

Key Findings from the General
Population Poll 2022

Acknowledgements

The Rule of Law in Ecuador: Key Findings from the General Population Poll 2022 was produced by the World Justice Project under the research oversight of Alejandro Ponce and the executive direction of Elizabeth Andersen.

The production of this report was led by Ana María Montoya and Tanya Primiani. This report was prepared by Said Aarji, Erin Campbell, James Davis, Joshua Fuller, Skye Jacobs, Ana María Montoya, Santiago Pardo González, Enrique Paulin, Tanya Primiani, Hannah Rigazzi, Natalia Rodríguez Cajamarca, Jeison Sabogal Sánchez, Victoria Thomaides, Carlos Toruño Paniagua, and Moss Woodbury.

Mariana Lopez was the graphic design lead for this report, with support from Raquel Medina. Photo for cover provided by Vince Fleming via Unsplash.

Sampling, fieldwork, and data processing in Ecuador were conducted by StatMark Group, based in the United States. Data collection in Bolivia was conducted by Captura Consulting, based in Bolivia. Data collection in Colombia was conducted by Tempo Group SA, based in Colombia. Data collection in Peru was conducted by Datum Internacional S.A., based in Peru. Scripting of the questionnaire in the online platform SurveyToGo was conducted by Ezekiel Agwata of Polar Solutions.

The findings in this report are taken from the General Population Poll (GPP) conducted for the World Justice Project in 2022. The GPP’s conceptual framework and methodology were developed by Mark David Agrast, Juan Carlos Botero, and Alejandro Ponce. The methodology for this iteration of the GPP was developed by Lindsey Bock, Ana Cárdenas, Alicia Evangelides, Joshua Fuller, Nora Futtner, Amy Gryskiewicz, Verónica Jaso, Ana María Montoya, Alejandro Ponce, Eréndira González Portillo, Tanya Primiani, Natalia Rodríguez Cajamarca, Victoria Thomaides, and Marcelo Torres.

This report was made possible with the support of the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs' Office of Western Hemisphere (INL). The views expressed in this report are those of the survey respondents and do not necessarily represent the views of INL.

© Copyright 2023 by the World Justice Project.

Requests to reproduce this document should be sent to:
Alejandro Ponce
World Justice Project
1025 Vermont Avenue NW, Suite 1200
Washington, DC 20005, USA
Email: [email protected]

Washington, DC
1025 Vermont Avenue NW, Suite 1200 Washington, DC 20005, USA
P +1 (202) 407-9330

Mexico City
Gobernador José Guadalupe Covarrubias 57-20, San Miguel Chapultepec, 11850,
Miguel Hidalgo, Mexico City
worldjusticeproject.mx

ABOUT THIS REPORT

EFFECTIVE RULE OF LAW reduces corruption, combats poverty and disease, and protects people from injustices large and small. Strengthening the rule of law is an important objective for governments, donors, and civil society organizations around the world. To be effective, rule of law development requires clarity about the fundamental features that define the rule of law, as well as an adequate basis for its evaluation and measurement.

The Rule of Law in Ecuador: Key Findings from the General Population Poll 2022 presents question-level data drawn from the General Population Poll (GPP), an original data source designed and collected by the World Justice Project. To provide a more in-depth view of trends in perceptions of rule of law in Ecuador, this report also presents select findings over time and compared to Ecuador’s regional peers within the Andean subregion of Latin America and the Caribbean.

The GPP was conducted between June and August 2022 through face-to-face interviews to a nationally representative sample of 1,005 Ecuadorian households. This poll was designed to capture data on the experiences and perceptions of ordinary people regarding a variety of themes related to the rule of law.

This report represents the voices of people in Ecuador and their experiences with the rule of law in their country.

The data derived from the General Population Poll is presented in this report as thematic briefs, each one highlighting a different dimension of the rule of law from the perspective of Ecuadorians. These thematic briefs focus on the current rule of law ecosystem in Ecuador while simultaneously illuminating changes over time and comparisons across the following peer countries in the Andean region: Bolivia, Colombia, and Peru. Each section touches upon perceptions of and attitudes towards the following topics: accountability, authoritarianism, fundamental freedoms, corruption, bribery victimization, trust in institutions, the criminal justice system and its actors, police performance, crime victimization, support for victims of crime, security, and access to justice.

I About This Report 5

EXECUTIVE FINDINGS

The Rule of Law in Ecuador: Key Findings from the General Population Poll 2022 provides a comprehensive overview of how citizens perceive and experience the rule of law in Ecuador alongside comparative findings across the Andean region. The findings in this report indicate some positive trends in the general public’s perspective on the rule of law in Ecuador, including relatively positive views on police performance and victim support practices in the region. Despite these positive developments, however, these findings highlight the fact that many challenges—including deteriorating perceptions of government accountability, worsening perceptions of corruption, and weakened confidence in criminal justice system performance—persist. At the regional level, prominent trends include high perceptions of authoritarian behavior, worsening perceptions of personal safety, and low confidence in criminal justice system performance.


SECTION 1

Authoritarianism, Fundamental Freedoms, and Accountability

1. Authoritarianism

On average, between half and three-quarters of all respondents in the Andes agreed that top government officials engage in authoritarian behavior. Among respondents in the Andean region, on average, Ecuadorians most often felt that top government officials engage in authoritarian behavior and Peruvians least often felt that top government officials engage in authoritarian behavior.

  • When asked about authoritarian tendencies in Ecuador, respondents most often felt that top government officials attack or attempt to discredit opposition parties (76%), seek to influence the promotion and removal of judges (74%), and seek to limit the courts’ competencies and freedom to interpret the law (73%).
  • Compared to their regional counterparts, respondents in Ecuador most often felt that top government officials resort to almost every authoritarian tactic within the categories of “Attacks on Electoral Systems and Opposition Parties” and “Attacks on the Judiciary.” Regarding “Attacks on Media and Misinformation,” respondents in Ecuador most often felt that top government officials censor information that comes from outside the country (66%).

2. Fundamental Freedoms

On average, fewer respondents believe that their freedoms of expression, political participation, election, and religion are guaranteed in Colombia and Ecuador compared to 2018 and 2017, respectively. In contrast, the average percentage of respondents who believe that these freedoms are guaranteed remained fairly consistent in Bolivia and Peru. Throughout the Andes, fewer respondents agreed that local government officials are elected through a clean process and that media freedoms are guaranteed when compared against the last year of data collection.

  • When asked about respect for fundamental freedoms in Ecuador, respondents had more favorable views on freedom of religion, with 86% of respondents agreeing that religious minorities can observe their holy days. Conversely, Ecuadorians had less favorable views on freedoms of expression, with 40% and 47% of respondents agreeing that the media can express opinions against the government and expose cases of corruption, respectively.
  • Between 2017 and 2022, Ecuador's most significant trends in public opinions on freedoms include declines in the perceptions that local government officials are elected through a clean process (down 18 percentage points), civil society organizations can express opinions against the government (down 18 percentage points), and the media can expose cases of corruption (down 16 percentage points).

3. Accountability

Perceptions of accountability are negative in the Andes. Less than one-third of all respondents in Andean countries believe that high-ranking officials would be held accountable for breaking the law (with the exception of Peru, where 36% of respondents believe this to be the case). Respondents in Ecuador had the most negative perceptions of accountability when compared to regional peers in the Andes (only 20% of respondents believe that high-ranking government officials would be held accountable for breaking the law). Furthermore, public perceptions of impunity deteriorated the most in Ecuador, where the percentage of respondents who believe that high-ranking government officials would be held accountable dropped a dramatic 26 percentage points since 2017.

  • Only 20% of Ecuadorians believe that high-ranking government officials would be held accountable for breaking the law, marking a significant decline of 26 percentage points since 2017.

6 I Executive Findings

SECTION 2

Corruption and Trust

4. Corruption

Public views on the pervasiveness of corruption within the legislature deteriorated in every Andean country, and views on corruption within law enforcement, the executive branch, and the judiciary deteriorated in Bolivia, Colombia, and Ecuador. Compared to Andean peer countries, Ecuador saw the largest increases in the percentage of respondents who believe that some or all of the actors across all of these institutions are involved in corrupt practices. Out of all Andean countries, on average, more Colombians reported perceptions of corruption across all actors than their regional peers, whereas Bolivians reported the same least frequently.

  • Perceptions of corruption in Ecuador deteriorated most for judges and magistrates and prosecutors, with 37- and 33-point increases, respectively, in the percentage of respondents who believe that most or all of these actors engage in corrupt practices.
  • Members of the National Assembly are considered the most corrupt actors in Ecuador. Approximately 78% of respondents believe that most or all members of the National Assembly are involved in corrupt practices, a 24-percentage-point increase from 54% of respondents in 2017.
  • Teachers in public schools are considered the least corrupt actors in Ecuador, with 26% of respondents reporting that they believe most or all teachers are involved in corrupt practices.

5. Bribery Victimization

On average, Andean respondents reported paying a bribe most often in Colombia and least often in Peru. Throughout the region, respondents most frequently had to pay a bribe when requesting a government permit with the exception of Colombia, where respondents most often reported paying a bribe to request public benefits or assistance.

6. Trust

Andean respondents trust people living in their country more than any other public actor. In 2022, respondents in the Andean region most often reported having some or a lot of trust in people living in their country and expressed the lowest average levels of trust in executive actors with the exception of Bolivians, who expressed the lowest average levels of trust in police officers. On average, respondents in Ecuador least often reported having some or a lot of trust across all institutions. In contrast, respondents in Colombia reported the highest overall levels of trust.

  • Levels of trust in Ecuador declined across every institution between 2017 and 2022. Trust in people living in Ecuador declined the most between 2017 and 2022, with 35% of respondents reporting some or a lot of trust in 2022, compared to 59% in 2017.
  • In 2022, respondents in Ecuador most often reported having some or a lot of trust in people living in their country (35%) and least often reported having some or a lot of trust in local government officers (14%).

I Executive Findings 7

SECTION 3

Security and Criminal Justice

7. Crime Victimization

On average, roughly one-third (34%) of all respondents surveyed in the Andes reported experiencing a crime in the last 12 months. The percentage of respondents who reported their crime experience to an authority was fairly similar throughout the region, ranging from 40% to 42%.

  • Forty-one percent (41%) of Ecuadorians reported experiencing a crime in the last 12 months, a figure above the regional average (34%).
  • More than half (59%) of Ecuadorian respondents who were victims of a crime in Ecuador did not report the crime to an authority, with those respondents most often citing the belief that reporting would not help as their reason for not reporting (54%).

8. Security

Less than one-third (30%) of all Andean respondents feel safe or very safe when walking in their neighborhood at night, on average. This figure marks an average decline by 7 percentage points from the previous round of data collection. Compared to respondents in regional peer countries, Bolivians most often reported feeling safe in their neighborhood at night (35%), while less than one-quarter of Ecuadorians (21%) reported the same.

  • In Ecuador, approximately 1 in 5 (21%) respondents reported feeling safe in their neighborhood at night in 2022, marking a significant decline from 40% of respondents in 2017.
  • Ecuadorian women were less likely to feel safe walking in their neighborhood at night than respondents with other sociodemographic characteristics.

9. Criminal Justice

Across the Andes, respondents are most confident that the criminal justice system safeguards the presumption of innocence and least confident that the criminal justice system ensures timeliness. On average, respondents in Bolivia reported the highest levels of confidence in the criminal justice system overall, while respondents in Colombia reported the lowest levels of confidence. Average perceptions of the criminal justice system’s overall performance deteriorated in all Andean countries, though perceptions declined most in Ecuador since the last year of data collection.

  • Ecuadorians were most confident that the criminal justice system safeguards the presumption of innocence of defendants (49%) and ensures equal treatment of the accused (45%). Ecuadorians were least confident that the criminal justice system ensures timeliness (29%) and ensures uniform quality of service (31%).
  • Perceptions of adherence to widespread access to the justice system and uniform quality of service in the Ecuadorian criminal justice system worsened the most between 2017 and 2022, with declines of 28 and 27 percentage points, respectively.

10. Police Performance

When asked about their impressions of police performance, respondents in the Andes had the most negative views on crime control and accountability and the most positive views on absence of discrimination and public service, on average.

  • When asked about their impressions of police performance, respondents in Ecuador were most confident that:
    • Police treat all people with respect (63%).
    • Police are available to help when needed (53%).
    • Police serve the interests of the community (49%).
  • Respondents in Ecuador were least confident that:
    • Police perform effective and lawful investigations (21%).
    • Police do not serve the interests of politicians (21%).
    • Police respond to crime reports (28%).
  • In Ecuador, respondents most often indicated that suspects with a darker skin tone and tattoos would most likely be at a disadvantage in a criminal investigation.

11. Victim Support

In every country surveyed in the Andean region, a majority of respondents did not believe that victims of crime receive adequate support and protection. On average, respondents in Ecuador reported the most confidence in victim support practices overall, while respondents in Bolivia reported the least confidence in the victim support practices overall.

  • Ecuadorians were most often confident that crime victims are addressed using accessible language (48%) and receive a clear explanation of the crime reporting process (43%).
  • Ecuadorians were least often confident that crime victims receive prompt and courteous attention and are believed when reporting a crime (both 17%).

8 I Executive Findings

SECTION 4

Access to Justice

12. Access to Justice

Roughly 2 in 5 (42%) respondents in the Andes reported experiencing a legal problem in the last two years, on average. While the prevalence and severity of problems vary by country, the most common problems relate to consumer issues and housing. On average, 54% of respondents in the Andes reported that their legal problem has been resolved and the average time reported to resolve the problem was approximately 6 months.

  • Roughly half (51%) of Ecuadorians reported experiencing a legal problem in the last two years (a figure above the regional average of 42%). The most commonly reported problems included consumer issues, housing, and public services.
  • Less than one-third (30%) of surveyed Ecuadorians with a legal problem obtained advice from a person or organization that could help them better understand or resolve their problem, and approximately 1 in 6 (17%) reported that it was difficult or nearly impossible to find the money required to resolve their problem.
  • More than half (55%) of respondents in Ecuador who resolved their legal issue experienced at least one hardship during the resolution process. The most frequently cited hardship was economic – 34% of respondents reported experiencing loss of income, employment, or the need to relocate.

Note: In addition to the data found in regional charts included in this report, comparative data for regional peer countries referenced in the Executive Findings can be found in each country’s respective report.

I Executive Findings 9

THEMATIC FINDINGS

SECTION I

AUTHORITARIANISM, FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS
AND ACCOUNTABILITY

AUTHORITARIANISM


CHART 1.

Perceptions of Authoritarian Behaviors

Percentage of respondents who believe that top government officials...

Bolivia Colombia Ecuador Peru

| ATTACKS ON ELECTORAL SYSTEMS AND OPPOSITION PARTIES

| ATTACKS ON THE JUDICIARY

| ATTACKS ON THE MEDIA AND MISINFORMATION

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2022

II Thematic Findings 11

CHART 2.

Perceptions of Authoritarian Behavior, by Support for the Current Administration

Percentage of respondents in Ecuador who believe that top government officials...

Government Supporter Non-Government Supporter

| ATTACKS ON ELECTORAL SYSTEMS AND OPPOSITION PARTIES

| ATTACKS ON THE JUDICIARY

| ATTACKS ON THE MEDIA AND MISINFORMATION

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2022

12 II Thematic Findings

CHART 3.

Attitudes Towards Authoritarianism and Rule of Law

Percentage of respondents who agree with the following statements

The president can attack the media, civil society, and opposition groups

The president must respect the media, civil society, and opposition groups

None of the above

The president can undermine independent authorities

The president must respect independent authorities

None of the above

Government efficiency is more important than citizen influence

It is important that citizens have a say in government matters, even at the expense of efficiency

None of the above

The president should not be bound by the laws or courts

The president must always obey the law and the courts

None of the above

It is not necessary to obey the laws of a government that you did not vote for

It is important to obey the government in power, no matter who you voted for

None of the above

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2022

II Thematic Findings 13

FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS

CHART 4.

Fundamental Freedoms in Ecuador Over Time

Percentage of respondents who believe the following statements

| EXPRESSION

People can express opinions against the government

Civil society organizations can express opinions against the government

Political parties can express opinions against the government

The media can express opinions against the government without fear of retaliation

The media can expose cases of corruption

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2014, 2017, and 2022

14 II Thematic Findings

| PARTICIPATION

People can attend community meetings

People can join any political organization

People can organize around an issue or petition

| ELECTIONS

Local government officials are elected through a clean process

People can vote freely without feeling harassed or pressured

| RELIGION

Religious minorities can observe their holy days

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2014, 2017, and 2022

II Thematic Findings 15

CHART 5.

Perceptions of Fundamental Freedoms in Andean Countries

Percentage of respondents who believe the following statements

| EXPRESSION

People can express opinions against the government

Civil society organizations can express opinions against the government

Political parties can express opinions against the government

The media can express opinions against the government without fear of retaliation

The media can expose cases of corruption

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2022

16 II Thematic Findings

| PARTICIPATION

People can attend community meetings

People can join any political organization

People can organize around an issue or petition

| ELECTIONS

Local government officials are elected through a clean process

People can vote freely without feeling harassed or pressured

| RELIGION

Religious minorities can observe their holy days

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2022

II Thematic Findings 17

GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY

CHART 6.

Perceptions of Accountablity in Andean Countries Over Time

Percentage of respondents in Ecuador and regional peer countries who believe that high-ranking government officials would be held accountable for breaking the law

Bolivia Colombia Ecuador Peru

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2014, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2022

18 II Thematic Findings

THEMATIC FINDINGS

SECTION II

CORRUPTION AND TRUST

CORRUPTION

CHART 7.

Perceptions of Corruption by Institution Over Time

Percentage of respondents who believe that most or all people working in the following institutions are corrupt

| MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

| POLICE OFFICERS

| EXECUTIVE

Local Government Officers
National Government Officers

| JUDICIARY

Prosecutors  Judges & Magistrates
Public Defense Attorneys

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2014, 2017, and 2022

20 II Thematic Findings

CHART 8.

Perceptions of Corruption in the Andean Region, by Institution

Percentage of respondents who think people in the following groups are involved in corrupt practices

Bolivia Colombia Ecuador Peru

| THE MEDIA AND POLITICAL PARTIES

| NATIONAL AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT

| ADMINISTRATIVE AND BUREAUCRATIC INSTITUTIONS

| SECURITY AND JUSTICE INSTITUTIONS

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2022

II Thematic Findings 21

CHART 9.

Attitudes Towards Corrupt Behaviors in the Andean Region

Percentage of respondents who believe the following behaviors are always or usually acceptable

Bolivia Colombia Ecuador Peru

| BRIBES OFFERED

| BRIBES REQUESTED

| NEPOTISM AND EMBEZZLEMENT

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2022

22 II Thematic Findings

BRIBERY VICTIMIZATION

CHART 10.

Bribery Victimization in Ecuador and Regional Peer Countries

Percentage of respondents who paid a bribe in the last three years to access the following services, out of those who used these services

| REQUEST A GOVERNMENT PERMIT OR DOCUMENT

| REQUEST PUBLIC BENEFITS OR ASSISTANCE

| OBTAIN A BIRTH CERTIFICATE OR GOVERNMENT ISSUED ID

| SECURE A PLACE AT A PUBLIC SCHOOL

| USE A PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2022

II Thematic Findings 23

TRUST

CHART 11.

Trust in Institutions Over Time

Percentage of respondents who have a lot or some trust in...

| PEOPLE LIVING IN THEIR COUNTRY

| POLICE OFFICERS

| EXECUTIVE

Local Government Officers
National Government Officers

| JUDICIARY

Prosecutors  Judges & Magistrates
Public Defense Attorneys

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2014, 2017, and 2022

24 II Thematic Findings

THEMATIC FINDINGS

SECTION III

SECURITY AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE

CRIME VICTIMIZATION

CHART 12.1

Types of Crimes Experienced by People in Ecuador

Victimization rate, by type of crime

CHART 12.2

Crime Victimization Rates and Reporting

Data on crime victimization and reporting in Ecuador

Note: For additional information on how Chart 12.1 and Chart 12.2 were produced, please see the Appendix.

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2022

26 II Thematic Findings

SECURITY

CHART 13.1

Perceptions of Security in Ecuador Over Time

Percentage of respondents who reported that they feel safe or very safe walking in their neighborhood at night

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2014, 2017, and 2022

CHART 13.2

Impact of Sociodemographic Characteristics on Perceptions of Safety

Likelihood that respondents feel safe or very safe walking in their neighborhood at night

Note: The results in this infographic were obtained from a logit regression. Each point indicates the average marginal effect of the corresponding sociodemographic characteristic on the predicted probability of a respondent to answer “safe” or “very safe” to the question “How safe do you feel walking in your neighborhood at night?” The lines indicate the 95% confidence intervals of each average marginal effect. For additional information on how Chart 13.2 was produced, please see the Regression Key linked in the Appendix.

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2022

II Thematic Findings 27

CRIMINAL JUSTICE

CHART 14.

Perceptions of the Criminal Justice System in Ecuador

Percentage of respondents who are confident that the criminal justice system...

2022 2017

Note: For additional information on how Chart 14 was produced, please see the Appendix.

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2017 and 2022

28 II Thematic Findings

CHART 15.

Criminal Justice Actors

Perceptions of criminal justice actors in Ecuador

Prosecutors Public Defense Attorneys Judges & Magistrates

| TRUST IN CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACTORS OVER TIME

Percentage of respondents who have a lot or some trust in prosecutors, public defense attorneys, and judges and magistrates

| PERCEPTIONS OF CORRUPTION ACROSS CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACTORS OVER TIME

Percentage of respondents who believe that most or all prosecutors, public defense attorneys, and judges and magistrates are corrupt

| PERCEPTIONS OF EFFECTIVENESS ACROSS CRIMINAL JUSTICE ACTORS OVER TIME

Percentage of respondents who believe that prosecutors, public defense attorneys, and judges and magistrates do their job well

Note: Variables in Effectiveness category are as follows: Prosecutors prosecute crimes committed in an independent manner and are not subject to any sort of pressure; Public defenders do everything they can to defend poor people that are accused of committing a crime; Judges decide cases in an independent manner and are not subject to any sort of pressure.

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2014, 2017, and 2022

II Thematic Findings 29

POLICE

CHART 16.

Perceptions of the Police

Opinions on the effectiveness and legitimacy of law enforcement

| EFFECTIVENESS

Serve the Public

Percentage of respondents who believe that the police...


Crime Control and Safety

Percentage of respondents who believe that the police...

| LEGITIMACY

Due Process

Percentage of respondents who believe that the police...


Discrimination

Percentage of respondents who believe that the police do not discriminate against suspects based on....

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2022

30 II Thematic Findings

Corruption

Percentage of respondents who believe that the police...


Trust and Crime Reporting

Percentage of respondents who...

Accountability

Percentage of respondents who believe that the police...

Note: For additional information on how Chart 16 was produced, please see the Appendix

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2022

II Thematic Findings 31

VICTIM SUPPORT

CHART 17.

Perceptions of the Treatment of Crime Victims

Percentage of respondents who are confident that crime victims...

Note: For additional information on how Chart 17 was produced, please see the Appendix.

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2022

32 II Thematic Findings

THEMATIC FINDINGS

SECTION IV

ACCESS TO JUSTICE

ACCESS TO JUSTICE JOURNEY

CHART 18

Justice Journey in Ecuador

Paths followed by Ecuadorians who experienced a legal problem in the last two years

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2022

34 II Thematic Findings

Note: For additional information on how Chart 18 was produced, please see the Appendix.

Source: WJP General Population Poll 2022

II Thematic Findings 35

PROJECT DESIGN

METHODOLOGY

To present an image that accurately portrays the rule of law as experienced by ordinary people, data in this report is drawn from the General Population Poll (GPP), an original data source designed and collected by the World Justice Project (WJP). The GPP captures the experiences and perceptions of ordinary citizens concerning the performance of the state and its agents and the actual operation of the legal framework in their country.

The General Population Poll used to collect data in Ecuador in 2022 features several new questions that highlight perceptions on issues salient to the region, including corruption, authoritarian behaviors, police performance, criminal justice, and security. In total, the General Population Poll questionnaire includes 115 perception-based questions and 77 experience-based questions, along with sociodemographic information on all respondents. Additionally, the GPP in Ecuador was administered to a sample of 1,005 respondents.

Data Collection

The GPP in Ecuador was conducted for the WJP's The Rule of Law in Ecuador: Key Findings from the General Population Poll 2022 with sampling, fieldwork, and data processing by StatMark Group, based in Florida, USA. StatMark Group administered the surveys between June and August 2022, conducting face-to-face interviews using a multi-stage stratified random sampling design. The target population group for this survey included Ecuadorians aged 18 years or older residing across six major provinces throughout the country.

SAMPLE SIZE AND SAMPLE FRAME

The General Population Poll in Ecuador represents an achieved total sample size of 1,005 interviews distributed proportionally across two regions. StatMark Group based the sampling frame on the 2021-2022 projected population figures from the National Institute of Statistics and Census (INEC), acquiring a proportionally stratified sample by region, age, gender, socioeconomic status, and level of urbanization.

In order to address all relevant topics while controlling the questionnaire length, the World Justice Project split three of the survey modules into two versions (Option A and Option B) and randomly assigned one option to each respondent for each module. These modules included: Hypothetical Situations, Civic Participation, and Institutional Performance. Aside from these modules, the questionnaires are identical. A link to the complete survey instrument, in English and Spanish, can be found in the Appendix of this report.

SAMPLING

Regions, provinces, and cantons were selected to achieve a nationally representative sample of the country. Within cantons, parishes were selected as the primary sampling unit according to quotas set for age, gender, socioeconomic level, and geographical units. Within urban parishes, enumeration areas were randomly selected. In rural parishes, surveyors constructed the first enumeration area around a central neighborhood and selected additional sampling units from the surrounding area, moving in a clockwise direction. Ten interviews were assigned to each enumeration area. Within the sampled segments, survey administrators performed a systematic random route to sample households and used a Kish grid to select respondents. If the selected respondent declined to be interviewed or otherwise did not meet the characteristics of the target quota, the interviewer moved on to the next household.

III Project Design 37

DESCRIPTION OF THE SAMPLE

COVERAGE: Interviews were distributed across regions to create a nationally representative sample. Fifty-four percent (54%) of the interviews took place in the Sierra region and the remaining 46% took place in the Costa region.

GEOGRAPHY: Thirty-six percent (36%) of respondents resided in rural areas and municipalities, while 64% of respondents resided in metro areas or cities.

RACIAL AND ETHNIC BACKGROUND: Most respondents (81%) identified themselves as Mestizo, followed by White (5%) and Afro-Ecuadorian (4%).

GENDER: Fifty-one percent (51%) of respondents were female and 49% were male.

EDUCATION: Most respondents (70%) reported that they had received at least a high school diploma or vocational degree, and the remaining 30% of respondents received up to a middle school diploma.

RESPONSE RATES

Eligible household, non-interview 2,810
Refusals 1,157
Break-off 74
Non-contact 1,579
Ineligible household 104
No eligible respondent in the household 90
Quota filled 14

INTERVIEWING AND QUALITY CONTROL

In total, 28 interviewers worked on this project, including 18 female interviewers. Enumerators worked in six groups of four to five interviewers with one supervisor per group. Interviews were conducted in Spanish.

The supervisory team directly oversaw 40% of all interviews in the field. During data processing, 50% of the interviews conducted in each city were verified by the central office. Any interview with abnormal audio, answer patterns, or duration was backchecked via telephone. After quality control, 59 interviews were rejected from the final sample. Interviews averaged 40 minutes in length and ranged from 19 to 93 minutes.

DATA REVIEW AND JUSTIFICATION

As part of the data analysis process, the team consulted several third-party sources in order to contextualize and validate perception-based data captured by the General Population Poll and compare it with the objective rule of law situation in-country. Peer data sources consulted include select indicators measured by the Latin American Public Opinion Project (LAPOP)'s AmericasBarometer, Latinobarómetro, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem), Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index, the Bertelsmann Stiftung's Transformation Index (BTI), and Freedom House's Freedom in the World. While certain trends captured by the 2022 General Population Poll in Ecuador are comparable to trends in perceptions data measured by other indices, the experiences and perceptions presented in this report may not always coincide with the reality of Ecuador's rule of law performance as measured by other sources.

HISTORICAL DATA

Historical data in this report derives from the WJP Rule of Law Index®'s General Population Poll that is typically administered every two to three years using a nationally representative probability sample ranging from 500 to 1,000 respondents. These household surveys were administered in the three largest cities of most countries until 2018, when the World Justice Project transitioned to nationally representative coverage as the preferred methodology for polling. The historical polling data used in this year's reports was collected in the following intervals: Data for Bolivia, Colombia, and Peru was collected in 2016, 2018, and 2022. Data for Ecuador was collected in 2014, 2017, and 2022.

38 III Project Design

ADDITIONAL COUNTRIES

The Rule of Law in Ecuador: Key Findings from the General Population Poll 2022 includes comparisons to the following Andean countries surveyed by the World Justice Project during the same period: Bolivia, Colombia and Peru. This report is additionally part of a series that presents findings from the following five sub-regions within Latin America and the Caribbean: Andes (Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru); Southern Cone (Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay); Eastern Caribbean (Barbados, Dominica, Grenada, St. Lucia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, Trinidad and Tobago); Greater Antilles, The Bahamas, and the Guianas (The Bahamas, the Dominican Republic, Guyana, Haiti, Jamaica, Suriname); and Central America (Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama). Together, these 26 countries are a portion of the 140 countries and jurisdictions included in the WJP Rule of Law Index 2022 report. Detailed information regarding the methodology of the Rule of Law Index is available at: www.worldjusticeproject.org.

Country Polling Company Methodology Sample
Argentina StatMark Group Face-to-face 759
The Bahamas DMR Insights Ltd. Face-to-face 500
Barbados DMR Insights Ltd. Face-to-face 500
Belize CID Gallup Face-to-face 1,500
Bolivia Captura Consulting Face-to-face 1,000
Brazil About Brazil Market Research Face-to-face 1,109
Colombia Tempo Group SA Face-to-face 1,000
Costa Rica CID Gallup Face-to-face 1,005
Dominica DMR Insights Ltd. Face-to-face 500
Dominican Republic CID Gallup Face-to-face 1,002
Ecuador StatMark Group Face-to-face 1,005
El Salvador CID Gallup Face-to-face 2,010
Grenada DMR Insights Ltd. Face-to-face 500
Guatemala Mercaplan Face-to-face 2,002
Guyana StatMark Group Face-to-face 500
Haiti CID Gallup Face-to-face 507
Honduras Mercaplan Face-to-face 2,000
Jamaica StatMark Group Face-to-face 1,001
Nicaragua CID Gallup Telephone 1,014
Panama CID Gallup Face-to-face 2,023
Paraguay Datum Internacional S.A./BM Business Partners Face-to-face 1,000
Peru Datum Internacional S.A. Face-to-face 1,029
St. Lucia DMR Insights Ltd. Face-to-face 500
St. Vincent and the Grenadines DMR Insights Ltd. Face-to-face 500
Suriname D3: Designs, Data, Decisions Face-to-face 502
Trinidad and Tobago CID Gallup Face-to-face 1,001
III Project Design 39

APPENDIX

Methodological Materials

GENERAL POPULATION POLL (GPP)

The General Population Poll in South America was designed to capture high-quality data on the realities and concerns of ordinary people on a variety of themes related to the rule of law, including authoritarianism, government accountability, bribery, corruption, police performance, crime and security, and access to justice.

World Justice Project General Population Poll 2022 – South American Survey Instrument (English Versions A & B)

World Justice Project General Population Poll 2022 – South American Survey Instrument (Spanish Versions A & B)

World Justice Project General Population Poll 2022 – South American Survey Instrument (Portuguese Versions A & B)

VARIABLES USED IN INFOGRAPHICS ON CRIME VICTIMIZATION

This table lists the question-level variables from the General Population Poll used to construct Chart 12.1 and the “Reasons the crime was not reported” table in Chart 12.2.

World Justice Project Crime Rates and Reporting Variable Map

REGRESSION TABLES FOR REGRESSION ANALYSIS USED IN INFOGRAPHIC ON PERCEPTIONS OF SECURITY

This document includes the question-level variables from the General Population Poll used in the regression analysis and the regression results featured in Chart 13.2.

World Justice Project Regression Tables

VARIABLES USED IN INFOGRAPHIC ON THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM

This table lists the question-level variables from the General Population Poll used to construct Chart 14.

World Justice Project Criminal Justice System Variable Map

VARIABLES USED IN INFOGRAPHIC ON THE POLICE

This table lists the question-level variables from the General Population Poll used to construct Chart 16.

World Justice Project Police Performance Variable Map

VARIABLES USED IN INFOGRAPHIC ON PERCEPTIONS OF THE TREATMENT OF CRIME VICTIMS

This table lists the question-level variables from the General Population Poll used to construct Chart 17.

World Justice Project Victim Support Variable Map

VARIABLES USED IN INFOGRAPHIC ON ACCESS TO JUSTICE

This table lists the question-level variables from the General Population Poll used to construct Chart 18.

World Justice Project Access to Justice Variable Map

IV Appendix 41
WJP

ABOUT THE WORLD JUSTICE PROJECT

The World Justice Project (WJP) is an independent, multidisciplinary organization working to create knowledge, build awareness, and stimulate action to advance the rule of law worldwide. Effective rule of law is the foundation for communities of justice, opportunity, and peace–underpinning development, accountable government, and respect for fundamental rights.

The WJP builds and supports a global, multidisciplinary movement for the rule of law through three lines of work: collecting, organizing, and analyzing original, independent rule of law data, including the World Justice Project Rule of Law Index; supporting research, scholarship, and teaching about the importance of the rule of law, its relationship to development, and effective strategies to strengthen it; and connecting and building an engaged global network of policymakers and advocates to advance the rule of law through strategic partnerships, convenings, coordinated advocacy, and support for locally led initiatives.

Learn more at: worldjusticeproject.org.

42 IV Appendix

OTHER PUBLICATIONS

For more information click on the publication.

WJP